<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Toronto City Life &#187; 24h</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.torontocitylife.com/tag/24h/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.torontocitylife.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="search"
           href="http://www.torontocitylife.com/opensearch"
           type="application/opensearchdescription+xml"
           title="Content Search" />		<item>
		<title>Rude ways to use dead trees</title>
		<link>http://www.torontocitylife.com/2009/09/16/rude-ways-to-use-dead-trees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.torontocitylife.com/2009/09/16/rude-ways-to-use-dead-trees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[B Sides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24h]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eye weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[now magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t.o.night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tabloid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torontocitylife.com/?p=4750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Out of TCL’s loyal following of at least three readers (hi mom!), I’ve recently received a comment that made me think that I need to clarify things a little. It has to do with veracity; the veracity of these posts. The truthicity of the blog. In other words, do I make stuff up to fill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of TCL’s loyal following of <em>at least</em> three readers (hi mom!), I’ve recently received a comment that made me think that I need to clarify things a little. It has to do with veracity; the veracity of these posts. The truthicity of the blog.</p>
<p>In other words, do I make stuff up to fill in the spaces between the photos?</p>
<p>The answer to that is complex. I like to think of the question as an open-ended one, like religion or Marxism. Or the purpose of the chicken in crossing the boulevard. So the answer is, yes, I make up nonsensical sentences to sandwich between photos. Or are they so sensical that they’re <em>BLoWINg yOuR MiNd</em>?!</p>
<p>Okay.</p>
<p>However, I only make up stuff real-sounding stuff when it’s easy to verify as being made up. Like me being friends with George Clooney. I mean, if anyone took that seriously … I found that jerk passed out on my couch one Saturday morning, the whole place trashed, underwear of every gender on everything, I don’t know <em>how</em> many condoms on the living room table; I told him, if he’s gonna self-destruct, he’s not taking me out with him. He basically spat in my face for an answer. Friends, we are not.</p>
<p>Anyhow, I don’t feel it’s fair to pull the wool over anyone’s eyes when I talk about the day. If it was boring, I’ll just resort to writing a post in which I explain the factuality of the blog or some crap like that.</p>
<p>To confess, I do sometimes embellish. A little. A difficult woman with a large heinie may, for example, be described as a backside as gelatinous and stark as shrieking horror itself. But I don’t think the embellishment’s that extreme. And I think it helps get the point across: that the big-bummed woman was unpleasant.</p>
<p>I guess it’s the high school semester I spent hunched over the junior writer’s / gofer’s desk at the prestigious <a href="http://www.metroland.com/Communities/100062/Scarborough_Mirror" target="_blank">Scarborough Mirror</a>, but that *umph* for journalistic integrity stuck with me. Journalistic integrity with irritable bowels. Sometimes uncomfortable and cramped, but relax and it’s party time in your pants.</p>
<p>So, since I’m on the ugly truth thing, I guess I should come clean about something. I didn’t care to see Natalie Portman today because something distracted  me. And it had something to WITH <strong><em>THIS</em></strong>!!</p>
<p><a href="http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/8459/forass1024.jpg" rel="lightbox[4750]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4751" title="not even absorbent" src="http://www.torontocitylife.com/wp-content/plugins/image-shadow/cache/fece7f101275441b7233ad3c39b04c3d.jpg" alt="not even absorbent" width="550" height="413" /></a></p>
<p>… no, wait. <em>WITH</em> <strong><em>THIS</em></strong>!!</p>
<p><a href="http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/938/myass1024.jpg" rel="lightbox[4750]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4752" title="are they taking the piss?!" src="http://www.torontocitylife.com/wp-content/plugins/image-shadow/cache/550ca93a165774e82fab2e98ad090668.jpg" alt="are they taking the piss?!" width="550" height="413" /></a></p>
<p>To begin with, what’s with the giant <a href="http://www.blogto.com/" target="_blank">blogTO</a> plug? Who nibbled on who’s private parts to get that in there? This is the kind of thing that makes my inner journalist vomit internally.</p>
<p>Can you imagine TCL in print on the street? What a rude way to use to use a dead tree. Seriously.</p>
<p>Then, you’ve got this teeny-tiny format tabloid newsed-paper that looks <em>suspiciously</em> like the <a href="http://www.nationalenquirer.com/" target="_blank">National Enquirer</a>. It’s being handed out at strategic locations by … not my words … <em>retro-branded “Newsies”</em>. I shed a tear every evening watching them stand there on the corner pretending like the thirties are relevant to anyone. And for the dumb hats they have to wear.</p>
<p>When you visit the <a href="http://tonightnewspaper.com/" target="_blank">website</a> of the paper, it’s suspiciously void of any information. Owned and operated by “three Torontonians”? That narrows it down to <em>everyone here.</em> Seems shifty. <em>Real</em> shifty.</p>
<p>And with all <a href="http://www.metronews.ca/toronto" target="_blank">the</a> <a href="http://eedition.toronto.24hrs.ca/epaper/viewer.aspx" target="_blank">free</a> <a href="http://www.nowtoronto.com/" target="_blank">publications</a> <a href="http://www.eyeweekly.com/" target="_blank">around</a> <a href="http://exclaim.ca/default.aspx?csid1=0" target="_blank">town</a>, t.o.night is stepping into a snug alley. I’m pretty sure that Now Magazine and Eye Weekly aren’t above administering a mugging.</p>
<p>Good luck, t.o.night. Because there&#8217;s an ass-kicking scheduled for t.o.morrow.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.torontocitylife.com%2F2009%2F09%2F16%2Frude-ways-to-use-dead-trees%2F&amp;title=Rude%20ways%20to%20use%20dead%20trees" id="wpa2a_2">Share / save this post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.torontocitylife.com/2009/09/16/rude-ways-to-use-dead-trees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

