Ford’s appeal: let’s get our facts straight, people!
Posted on
December 11th, 2012by Patrick – 2 great comments. Room for one more!
It’s still making the rounds!
Rob Ford was taken out on a technicality! He never should’ve been tossed out since the original decision forcing him to repay was invalid!
And so on.
Let’s pick this apart. It won’t take too long, it’s very simple!
- Voting to let yourself off the hook for something is the very definition of “conflict of interest”. Had Miller put a motion before City Council to appoint himself Fuhrer of Toronto, and then voted on it, would that be considered a conflict of interest? Unlikely as that may sound, it would be within his power to do so, and yet it can easily be argued that it doesn’t involve any money. But I guess if you’re a Fordite, that kind of thing would’ve been perfectly fine — just so long as Miller didn’t make any money off of it. Thumbs up, Ford supporters; brilliant logic!
- Let’s say that the decision forcing Rob to repay the money was in fact beyond the pale of City Council — if that’s the case, what’s to stop any councillor from abusing their office at any time? Let’s say Adam Vaughan decided that he would support the destruction of the Gardiner Expressway in exchange for donations to his personal charity. That’s called “influence peddling”, and it’s exactly what Ford did. But guess what, Vaughan didn’t get any of the money, it went to his own charity, so once again it’s all perfectly fine and above board, right? Or is it only wrong if someone who isn’t Ford does it? Can’t have it both ways!
Furthermore, if Fordo believed that this was completely out of the Council’s jurisdiction, why did he completely validate it all by not only “explaining” how important it was for him to abuse his position as mayor, but also vote on it? By the same logic, any Fordite approached by anyone claiming to be a cop on the street should immediately submit to anything that the “officer” says, because after all, that’s how you insist that your mayor behaves. Then, once you’re in the back of the unmarked van, complain about how fucking stupid you were to have trusted the “cop” in the first place — just like Rob Ford. - Maybe the mayor didn’t know that Council wasn’t able to make such rules? Maybe he didn’t read the handbook? Maybe he claimed complete ignorance of anything associated with his position? How about all of the above? But that’s okay — why would we need a mayor that knows how to do the job? It’s just like business: we should entrust the operation to someone who admits to complete incompetence and ignorance.
Once again, bravo on your logic, Fordites!
And Ford should be allowed to continue to be mayor in the face of all of this? Anyone who supports this position supports all of the above: incompetence, lies, naivete, brazen self-indulgence, ignorance, and corruption — none of which Ford denied.
I’m getting sick of repeating these simple facts, but the media are pumping out so much blatant misinformation, misdirection, and just plain bullshit, we need to keep repeating it for them.
Nice … and slow … and simple.
... with pictures
... with sounds
... with videos
... with opinions
... that's shorter
... that's longer
December 19th, 2012 11:54 am
Yabbut….what about all those underprivledged youts? The BoscoBusBoys or whatever they’re called? What’s going to happen to them without the only human being who can control them, eh? Answer me that Mr. Latte Sipping Leftist/Pinko, Commie, Bicycling, NDP Socalist, Layton Lover!
(Signed ‘Doug from where the sun never shines)
January 8th, 2013 9:34 am
<3.